That sentence is a little hard to parse, but are you saying you should sometimes publish things just as a little present to yourself, even if they have no relevance to anything in the outside world?
This is in response to a suggestion that if you have papers that are never cited by anyone other than yourself that this is bad. I agree that if nobody is interested in any of your work, this might be a problem.
But if you never, ever pump out a paper that isn’t cited? I think that is unfortunate. It implies a lack of independent scientific interest to me. It implies you aren’t following your own muse enough.
Well, one doesn’t necessarily know whether a seemingly trivial and whimsical foray into navel-gazing might actually end up being of interest to others. So one should arguably publish that sort of stuff and let the mob be its judge…
… unless, of course… it concerns some hair-brained Friday afternoon experiments on the proteomics of bong water or whathaveyou. That shit needs to just stay on one’s hard drive where it cannot offend the rational sensibilities of one’s fellow right-minded colleagues. Navel-gazing is one thing; wondering around the playground in a dirty mac flashing the fruits of one’s questionably pertinent exertions is quite another.
RT @trikomes: Age-dependent effects of chronic low doses of THC (in mice) on neuroplasticity.
Young mice: dendritic spines (structures wh… 4 hours ago
RT @Metabo_Dave: How are we supposed to take out 6 year old to swim practice at 4pm on Monday and Wednesday afternoons???
Most sports team… 4 hours ago
RT @ShoutCrowPress: @nlinggod I saw someone from Toronto in here and I’m also in Ontario: most of our Provincial parks and conservatories h… 6 hours ago
March 20, 2014 at 8:56 am
That sentence is a little hard to parse, but are you saying you should sometimes publish things just as a little present to yourself, even if they have no relevance to anything in the outside world?
LikeLike
March 20, 2014 at 9:01 am
This is in response to a suggestion that if you have papers that are never cited by anyone other than yourself that this is bad. I agree that if nobody is interested in any of your work, this might be a problem.
But if you never, ever pump out a paper that isn’t cited? I think that is unfortunate. It implies a lack of independent scientific interest to me. It implies you aren’t following your own muse enough.
LikeLike
March 20, 2014 at 9:01 am
(and now I better check if I have any papers that qualify)
LikeLike
March 20, 2014 at 12:12 pm
I published a paper no one gives a shit about. It’s an h-index millstone around my neck.
LikeLike
March 20, 2014 at 12:39 pm
Papers can’t subtract from h-index….only improve.
LikeLike
March 21, 2014 at 4:14 am
“But if you never, ever pump out a paper that isn’t cited? I think that is unfortunate. It implies a lack of independent scientific interest to me. ”
What? It’s the first day of spring – a little too early for April fool’s.
LikeLike
March 22, 2014 at 3:12 am
Eli has a two pager with NO cites that pretty much killed off an entire experimental method.
LikeLike
March 22, 2014 at 7:15 am
The only papers I’ve ever published with no citations are ones that just came out. A few weeks ago.
LikeLike
March 23, 2014 at 5:20 am
Well, one doesn’t necessarily know whether a seemingly trivial and whimsical foray into navel-gazing might actually end up being of interest to others. So one should arguably publish that sort of stuff and let the mob be its judge…
… unless, of course… it concerns some hair-brained Friday afternoon experiments on the proteomics of bong water or whathaveyou. That shit needs to just stay on one’s hard drive where it cannot offend the rational sensibilities of one’s fellow right-minded colleagues. Navel-gazing is one thing; wondering around the playground in a dirty mac flashing the fruits of one’s questionably pertinent exertions is quite another.
LikeLike
March 23, 2014 at 5:38 am
Do self-citations count?
LikeLike
March 24, 2014 at 3:39 pm
Why publish something that you think others won’t care about?
That’s like putting movies of yourself masturbating on the internet.
Oh, wait…
LikeLike
March 24, 2014 at 4:40 pm
I thought that looked like the other Dave in the video…
Oh wait…
LikeLike