Blogrolling: unlikely activist
June 27, 2012
I invite you to put the new blog of Professor J. David Jentsch on your list. At the unlikely activist you will find fare such as:
The mystery of addictions, Part 1: Why spend money on addiction research at all?
If they are remarkably lucky and have proper medical and psychological support, they may return to a healthy life and never use again. But for most, their freedom is only temporary, and they will relapse again days, weeks, months or even years later, returning them to their suffering and to their fateful spiral. You see, drugs kill. They are powerful toxins that can stop breathing or a heart. If they are injected, they can bring infectious diseases like hepatitis and HIV along with them. And because they intoxicate the mind, they lead to reckless driving and other behaviors that risk the lives of the addict and those around them.
Ignoring science, from the bench
Put differently, juveniles and teens have a brain fully capable of feeling powerful emotions (like anger), but their ability to resist those emotions and to behave in a socially appropriate manner (like to inhibit aggressive reactions) is not at adult levels. The 5 justices who struck down harsh penalties for child offenders recognized this; it was a crucial part of their logic in this, and the earlier death penalty, case.
But like a frightening number of people in our society, the other 4 justices viewed the science as either being wrong or irrelevant. Their own ethical or philosophical views about crime and punishment appeared to trump their interest in scientific principles and facts. In this regard, they are not unlike strident animal rights activists opposed to biomedical and behavioral research involving animals.
A solemn voice in support of medical researchers
In the fall of 2010, an animal rights extremist sent me razor blades and heinous threats to cut my throat in the mail. It became a national news story, again highlighting the abject cruelty of some in the anti-vivisection movement. During this time, I turned on my phone one evening to see that I had received a voice mail. Anticipating the worst – yet another cruel, rabid and profane threat from my opponents – I found something quite different. I have kept this communication private for long enough. Now, at the wishes of the caller, I am sharing it with the broader community to demonstrate that support for humane animal research is everywhere…. It comes not from greed or ignorance, but from love and a hope that no one should ever suffer the same loss as the caller.
VoiceofSupport (click on this link to listen to this .wav file)
June 27, 2012 at 2:55 pm
“Pro-Test” is the worst possible fucken name possible for an animal research advocacy organization. Ordinary people associate “animal testing” with shitte like mascara and shampoo, but they associate “animal research” with shitte like helping little children dying of horrible diseases. I’ve been saying this since they came up with that horrible name.
LikeLike
June 27, 2012 at 2:59 pm
Me too. It came over from the Brits and their battle to gain back the public discussion space for science. I guess the connotation differs over there….
LikeLike
June 28, 2012 at 12:12 pm
That guy should get an award for dealing with some of the whacko commenters he had with his first post. He was polite and diplomat in the face of so much fallacy and ad hominem. Thumbs up for Jentsch.
LikeLike