When you are reviewing papers for a journal, it is in your best interest to stake out papers most like your own as “acceptable for publication”.

If it is a higher IF than you usually reach, you should argue for a manuscript that is somewhat below that journal’s standard.

If it is a journal in which you have published, it is in your interest to crap on any manuscript that is lesser than your typical offerings.

It is sometimes easy to forget that the trainees do not have a boatload of their writing published yet.

Even if their way of phrasing it kind of sucks ass……there’s that.