From the most recent issue of Current Biology:

Fletcher and Rorth have recently discovered that the phenotypes reported in this paper were due to loss of function of both stathmin and the adjacent gene arc-p20, encoding an Arp2/3 component. The mistake was due to use of an incorrect arc-p20 rescue construct as well as mistakes in the subsequent fly crosses. The true stathmin loss-of-function phenotype is quite mild. The authors have confirmed this new result by generating a clean stathmin knockout through homologous recombination. Because the authors cannot cleanly attribute the originally observed effects to Stathmin, they therefore retract the paper. The authors are very sorry for this mistake and apologize for any inconvenience it might have caused.

The retracted paper is here.
Honest mistake?

Thanks to those of you who have already donated to the DonorsChoose Social Media Challenge for 2009! The DrugMonkey blog readers have been participating in our Challenge and have already raised $675 from 21 donors. Along the way you have helped to fund 9 proposals from school teachers!
But there are still lots of interesting and fun projects that could use your help and I will remind you that every little bit helps. Even $5 or $1 moves each of those proposals closer to reality. Since this drive started this blog has received anywhere from 500 to 1700 unique visitors per day. A little poll I ran received over 70 responses. You can scroll through and review the number of comments we get for yourself. So I know you like talking and thinking about science and the business of science, DearReader. How about giving a little bit of that back? Spread the science love around and throw down a little for the kids?