SfN07: SfN Meeting data 2001-2006
October 19, 2007
Fascinating data on SfN meeting participation from 2001-2006 is available as a paper placed on arXiv.
An analysis of the abstracts presented at the annual meetings of the Society for Neuroscience from 2001 to 2006
(Submitted on 12 Oct 2007 (v1), last revised 16 Oct 2007 (this version, v2))
I will always have to reference this as the place I picked up the concept that “we need to practice scientific birth control” in discussion of uninterrupted growth in the neuroscience community.
Other tidbits:
- 60% of abstract authors only attend a single meeting in the surveyed interval.
- average of 4.3 authors per abstract
- La Jolla is in the top ten in each year- Represent!
- no correlation between SfN attendance and NIH budget
- six degrees (actually 6.09) of separation confirmed for neuroscientists
- NIH ICs generally get what they pay for
October 20, 2007 at 7:08 am
Yeah, that is facinating. I have two thoughts:
(1) It seems implausible that there are a few individuals who are authors on more than 100 hundred abstracts, with one author on ~300! Could this be a weakness in their algorithm for disambiguating people with the same name? Maybe these authors are “Smith, J.” or “Wang, J.”?
(2) Figure 8 is really cool!
LikeLike