Comments on: Wikipedia on MDMA http://drugmonkey.wordpress.com/2007/02/09/wikipedia-on-mdma/ biomedical research, just another job... Fri, 18 Dec 2009 07:20:54 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: ScienceBlogs Channel : Technology | blogcable http://drugmonkey.wordpress.com/2007/02/09/wikipedia-on-mdma/#comment-3523 ScienceBlogs Channel : Technology | blogcable Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:17:17 +0000 http://drugmonkey.wordpress.com/2007/02/09/wikipedia-on-mdma/#comment-3523 [...] third DrugMonkey blog post I wrote was entitled Wikipedia on MDMA, posted Feb 9, 2007. I was reminded of this because of a recent call from the NIH for scientists and science writers to [...] [...] third DrugMonkey blog post I wrote was entitled Wikipedia on MDMA, posted Feb 9, 2007. I was reminded of this because of a recent call from the NIH for scientists and science writers to [...]

]]> By: Wikipedia entry on neuroscience: SfN call for action [DrugMonkey] « iThinkEducation.net! http://drugmonkey.wordpress.com/2007/02/09/wikipedia-on-mdma/#comment-3493 Wikipedia entry on neuroscience: SfN call for action [DrugMonkey] « iThinkEducation.net! Fri, 01 May 2009 03:19:06 +0000 http://drugmonkey.wordpress.com/2007/02/09/wikipedia-on-mdma/#comment-3493 [...] but one of the primary motivating factors triggers for ranting in this whole blogging thing was a dissatisfaction with the Wikipedia entry on MDMA. (It is a point of some pride that the current version of that entry references two posts of mine, [...] [...] but one of the primary motivating factors triggers for ranting in this whole blogging thing was a dissatisfaction with the Wikipedia entry on MDMA. (It is a point of some pride that the current version of that entry references two posts of mine, [...]

]]> By: drugmonkey http://drugmonkey.wordpress.com/2007/02/09/wikipedia-on-mdma/#comment-3411 drugmonkey Wed, 09 Jul 2008 18:40:45 +0000 http://drugmonkey.wordpress.com/2007/02/09/wikipedia-on-mdma/#comment-3411 That schism happened long after I wrote this post I think. If you go into the discussion you can see when/how and who was driving the split. You will also see that to this day there are self-appointed radical defenders of a certain tone over there that is reflexively anti-science. That schism happened long after I wrote this post I think. If you go into the discussion you can see when/how and who was driving the split. You will also see that to this day there are self-appointed radical defenders of a certain tone over there that is reflexively anti-science.

]]> By: reader http://drugmonkey.wordpress.com/2007/02/09/wikipedia-on-mdma/#comment-3410 reader Wed, 09 Jul 2008 02:09:57 +0000 http://drugmonkey.wordpress.com/2007/02/09/wikipedia-on-mdma/#comment-3410 Oddly, the wikipedia has two entries for mdma, the main one which is mediocre and a more obscure one for the effects of MDMA on the human body, which is actually pretty reasonable: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effects_of_MDMA_on_the_human_body Oddly, the wikipedia has two entries for mdma, the main one which is mediocre and a more obscure one for the effects of MDMA on the human body, which is actually pretty reasonable:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effects_of_MDMA_on_the_human_body

]]>